This is an amazingly bad idea.
Go ahead, read that article. I'll wait.
If you want the TLDR; version, in Ottawa when a team gets ahead by more than 5 goals in a game, they are declared the loser of the game. So here is the immediate take home message:
If you win too much, you lose.
This is pretty backwards. It's not how the real world works. It's wrong on many levels. I'd like to propose a different solution. It's one that I had personal experience with on a soccer team.
First, let's find a better way to define a blowout. A 5-goal lead isn't necessarily insurmountable. If the score is 10 - 5, it's clear that both teams have firepower, and the game could still go either way. Obviously there's got to be some kind of limitation on how many goals the losing team is scoring. So, let's say that that any time there's a 5+n/2 goal differential, where n is the number of goals the losing team has, it's a blowout. So blowouts happen at these scores:
| Loser | Winner |
|---|---|
| 0 | 5 |
| 1 | 6 |
| 2 | 8 |
| 3 | 9 |
Basically, it means that if you have a bit of firepower on your losing team, you can put off a blowout.
Next, let's talk about what happens when a blowout occurs. Making the "winning" team lose is a bad idea. It doesn't even make sense. It's going to stunt players ability to play, and rob them of the instincts that they need to go further in sport. Instead, let's say that the players who are "winning" win the game.
It's a crazy idea, I know.
So, the game's over. The problem with this is that if people are tracking personal stats (and some clubs do, and award prizes for them) then you've been robbed of the opportunity to increase your stats. Calculate the remaining time, get the coaches together, assign half of the kids on each team to play together. You end up with two teams, each made half up from kids of either team. Play the remainder of the game for fun, but track individuals performances (if you want) or just have a good time. Either way, both sides will learn something, and the team that's weaker will improve by having the opportunity to play with kids that are better than them.
This happened to me twice when growing up playing soccer, one time as the losing team and one time as the winning team. I remember both games to this day as amongst the most fun I had on the teams.
By Michael May 31, 2010 - 12:59 pm
Here’s an idea – if you exceed the 5 goal lead, kick a few in your own net and keep punishing the other team.
By aphoenix May 31, 2010 - 1:00 pm
@Michael – That’s a good idea – you can keep the beating going then, really humiliate the other team.
By Michael May 31, 2010 - 1:10 pm
Shame is a great teacher.
By Dawn May 31, 2010 - 2:51 pm
While I agree that the winning team shouldn’t be forced to “lose”, your solution seems really confusing (of course, I don’t know the rules of soccer all that well, so maybe it makes sense to those who do).
But if the same teams keep winning by 5+, or the same teams keep losing by 5+, wouldn’t it make more sense to consider moving those teams to a different league and/or skill level?
Example: The first season I played Perpetual Motion Ultimate frisbee, I was in the B league. After the spring session, Dave said “hey, you’re team’s not good enough for B, let’s drop you down to C for the summer session, see how well you do there.” And it worked – less competitive, more “fun”, and more our skill-level.
By aphoenix May 31, 2010 - 2:53 pm
Dawn, I agree – at the end of the year, if the team stays mostly the same, they should go up or down a league.
The problem arises in the middle of a season when you can’t actually change leages because it’ll mess up the championship probabilities.
Basically, my way comes down to: if one team is out, they forfeit. Then just practice for the rest of the schedule soccer time.
By Dawn May 31, 2010 - 2:57 pm
Ahh, forfeit :) Yes, now that makes sense.
Also a rule from frisbee that might work: when either team gets to xx points, they win and the game is over. Play time for the rest of the time. There’s still a winner and a loser, but it caps it so there isn’t so much of a gap between scores. (Although I do remember some games that were 10-0).
By Dawn May 31, 2010 - 2:58 pm
Can you tell my only experience with organized sport is with frisbee?
By aphoenix May 31, 2010 - 3:00 pm
Only knowing frisbee is okay. Most of my experience with organized sports is soccer, except for one year when I played Softball.